mechanical pencil: be better than pencils

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pencil
Weight: 0.74
, item
Weight: 0.58
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings fountain pen
Weight: 0.62
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, notepad
Weight: 0.33
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.33
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pencils 1.00
be better than regular pencils 0.96
be better than wooden pencils 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pencil, be better than regular pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pencil, be better than pencils)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pencil, be better than regular pencils)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be better than pencils)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be better than regular pencils)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pencil, be better than regular pencils)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than regular pencils)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than regular pencils)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than regular pencils)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than regular pencils)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than pencils)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than regular pencils)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than wooden pencils)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than pencils)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mechanical pencil, be better than pencils)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pencil, be better than regular pencils)