mechanical: be energy process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, trade
Weight: 0.56
, system
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings electronic device
Weight: 0.32
, electric motor
Weight: 0.32
, brake
Weight: 0.32
, valve
Weight: 0.32
, joystick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be energy process 1.00
is energy 0.85
has physical part process 0.83
is energy potential 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mechanical, be energy process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mechanical, is energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mechanical, has physical part process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mechanical, is energy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(mechanical, is energy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mechanical, has physical part process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mechanical, has physical part process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mechanical, is energy potential)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mechanical, is energy potential)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mechanical, is energy potential)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mechanical, is energy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mechanical, has physical part process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mechanical, is energy potential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mechanical, be energy process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(mechanical, be energy process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mechanical, be energy process)