meerkat: be in zoos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.70
, mongoose
Weight: 0.56
, app
Weight: 0.52
, creature
Weight: 0.45
, zoo
Weight: 0.43
Siblings hedgehog
Weight: 0.36
, panda bear
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36
, cheetah
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in zoos 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be in zoos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(panda bear, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be in zoos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(meerkat, be in zoos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meerkat, be in zoos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(meerkat, be in zoos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(meerkat, be in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(panda bear, be in zoos)