melbourne: was named melbourne

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named melbourne 1.00
be named melbourne 0.99
be called melbourne 0.94
was known as melbourne 0.94
was known as marvelous melbourne 0.85
be better than brisbane 0.76
be better than sydney 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be named melbourne)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be called melbourne)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was known as melbourne)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(melbourne, was known as melbourne)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(melbourne, be called melbourne)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(melbourne, be named melbourne)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was known as marvelous melbourne)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be better than brisbane)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, be better than sydney)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(melbourne, was known as melbourne)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be called melbourne)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be named melbourne)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(melbourne, be named melbourne)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(melbourne, be called melbourne)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(melbourne, was known as melbourne)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(melbourne, be better than brisbane)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(melbourne, be better than sydney)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(melbourne, was known as marvelous melbourne)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be better than brisbane)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(melbourne, be better than sydney)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(melbourne, was known as marvelous melbourne)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(melbourne, be better than sydney)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(melbourne, be better than brisbane)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(melbourne, was known as marvelous melbourne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, was named melbourne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(melbourne, was named melbourne)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(melbourne, was named melbourne)