melon: having weddings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.62
, flavor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cantaloupe
Weight: 0.73
, watermelon
Weight: 0.64
, honeydew
Weight: 0.50
, mango
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
having weddings 1.00
having big weddings 0.97
have weddings 0.97
have big weddings 0.95
have expensive weddings 0.95
have large weddings 0.94
have church weddings 0.93
have traditional weddings 0.92
have fancy weddings 0.91
insist on weddings 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, have fancy weddings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(watermelon, have fancy weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(watermelon, have fancy weddings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(melon, having weddings)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, having big weddings)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, have weddings)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(melon, have church weddings)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(melon, have weddings)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, have large weddings)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, having weddings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(melon, having weddings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(melon, having weddings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(watermelon, have fancy weddings)