member: be at cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.89
, representative
Weight: 0.68
, constituent
Weight: 0.62
, supporter
Weight: 0.62
Siblings observer
Weight: 0.69
, chairman
Weight: 0.68
, chairperson
Weight: 0.66
, chief
Weight: 0.65
, owner
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cabinet 1.00
meet his cabinet 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chairman, meet his cabinet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chairman, meet his cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chairman, meet his cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(member, be at cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(member, be at cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(member, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(member, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chairman, meet his cabinet)