member: be granted immunity from arrest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.89
, representative
Weight: 0.68
, constituent
Weight: 0.62
, vice president
Weight: 0.62
Siblings observer
Weight: 0.69
, chairman
Weight: 0.68
, chairperson
Weight: 0.66
, chief
Weight: 0.65
, owner
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be granted immunity from arrest 1.00
be granted immunity 0.95
have protection against arrest 0.83
have special protection against arrest 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(member, be granted immunity from arrest)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(member, be granted immunity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(member, be granted immunity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(member, be granted immunity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(member, have special protection against arrest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(member, have special protection against arrest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(member, have special protection against arrest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(member, be granted immunity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(member, have special protection against arrest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(member, be granted immunity from arrest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(member, be granted immunity from arrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(member, be granted immunity from arrest)