memphis: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.63
, broadway
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.58
, port
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.36
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, lincoln
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
has quality bad 0.78
have bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(memphis, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(memphis, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(memphis, is poor)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(memphis, have bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(memphis, have bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(memphis, have bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(memphis, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(memphis, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(memphis, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(memphis, have bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(memphis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(memphis, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(memphis, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)