memphis: smell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.63
, broadway
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.58
, port
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.36
, quebec city
Weight: 0.35
, lincoln
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
smell 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(charleston, smell)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(charleston, smell)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(charleston, smell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(memphis, smell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(memphis, smell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(memphis, smell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(memphis, smell)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charleston, smell)