men: have deeper than womens voices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, movie
Weight: 0.49
, novel
Weight: 0.47
Siblings burning man
Weight: 0.32
, wise man
Weight: 0.32
, different people
Weight: 0.31
, drunk people
Weight: 0.31
, gentleman
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have deeper than womens voices 1.00
have longer than womens shorts 0.81
be fat different from womens 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(men, have deeper than womens voices)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(men, have longer than womens shorts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(men, have longer than womens shorts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(men, have longer than womens shorts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(men, be fat different from womens)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(men, be fat different from womens)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(men, be fat different from womens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(men, have longer than womens shorts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(men, be fat different from womens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(men, have deeper than womens voices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(men, have deeper than womens voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(men, have deeper than womens voices)