men: have sizes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, movie
Weight: 0.49
, novel
Weight: 0.47
Siblings burning man
Weight: 0.32
, wise man
Weight: 0.32
, different people
Weight: 0.31
, drunk people
Weight: 0.31
, gentleman
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sizes 1.00
have different sizes 0.97
have different pant sizes 0.89
have pant sizes 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(men, have sizes)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(men, have different sizes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(men, have different sizes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(men, have different pant sizes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(men, have pant sizes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(men, have different sizes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(men, have different sizes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(men, have different pant sizes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(men, have pant sizes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(men, have different pant sizes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(men, have different pant sizes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(men, have pant sizes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(men, have pant sizes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(men, have sizes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(men, have sizes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(men, have sizes)