menagerie: has quality help

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents circus
Weight: 0.45
, episode
Weight: 0.39
, room
Weight: 0.38
, story
Weight: 0.36
, place
Weight: 0.35
Siblings laundry room
Weight: 0.28
, juggling
Weight: 0.28
, hotel room
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality help 1.00
has quality bad 0.86
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality help)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(circus, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(room, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(room, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(circus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(room, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(menagerie, has quality help)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(menagerie, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(menagerie, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(menagerie, has quality definition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(menagerie, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(menagerie, has quality help)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(circus, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(circus, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(menagerie, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, has quality bad)