mercury: was name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.69
, poison
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
, ingredient
Weight: 0.63
, air pollution
Weight: 0.62
Siblings arsenic
Weight: 0.37
, sodium fluoride
Weight: 0.37
, sodium sulfate
Weight: 0.37
, sodium nitrate
Weight: 0.37
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was name 1.00
was named 0.77
was discorverd 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(arsenic, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(arsenic, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mercury, was name)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mercury, was named)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mercury, was named)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mercury, was named)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mercury, was discorverd)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was named)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mercury, was discorverd)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mercury, was discorverd)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was discorverd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mercury, was name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(arsenic, was named)