merger: fails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.69
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.36
, takeover
Weight: 0.34
, partnership
Weight: 0.33
, incorporation
Weight: 0.32
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
fails 1.00
fail 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(partnership, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(takeover, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(partnership, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partnership, fail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(acquisition, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(acquisition, fail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(takeover, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(takeover, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(merger, fails)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(merger, fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(merger, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(merger, fail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(merger, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(merger, fails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(partnership, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(acquisition, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(merger, fails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(takeover, fail)