metabolism: be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.61
, journal
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glycolysis
Weight: 0.48
, catabolism
Weight: 0.43
, digestion
Weight: 0.36
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism 1.00
have advantage over anaerobic metabolism 0.86
have advantage over metabolism 0.84
be related to nutrients in food 0.79
be related to nutrients 0.79
relate to enzymes 0.78
be measured in calories 0.77
be important for homeostasis 0.77
is oxidative 0.77
putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, is oxidative)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(catabolism, is oxidative)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(catabolism, is oxidative)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(metabolism, relate to enzymes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(metabolism, be related to nutrients)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(metabolism, be related to nutrients in food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(metabolism, relate to enzymes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be measured in calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be related to nutrients in food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be related to nutrients)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, relate to enzymes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be related to nutrients)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be related to nutrients in food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(metabolism, be measured in calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(metabolism, be measured in calories)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(metabolism, be measured in calories)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(metabolism, relate to enzymes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(metabolism, be related to nutrients in food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(metabolism, be related to nutrients)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over metabolism)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, have advantage over anaerobic metabolism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(catabolism, is oxidative)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(metabolism, be dependent on carbohydrate metabolism)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, putting sodium hydrogen carbonate with acetic acid)