metal rod: be at construction site

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, weapon
Weight: 0.58
Siblings screwdriver
Weight: 0.56
, rod
Weight: 0.37
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.37
, metal
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at construction site 1.00
be at construction 0.92
be use in construction 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, be at construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(metal rod, be at construction site)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(material, be at construction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(material, be at construction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(metal, be use in construction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(material, be at construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(metal rod, be at construction site)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(metal, be use in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(metal, be use in construction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(metal rod, be at construction site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(metal rod, be at construction site)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(material, be at construction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(metal, be use in construction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(metal rod, be at construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(material, be at construction)