metal: be at steel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at steel 1.00
be at steel mill 0.89
has replace steel in many application 0.83
be make from iron ore 0.76
be at metal fabrication shop 0.76
be at steelmill 0.76
be element or alloy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(steel, be at steelmill)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steel, be make from iron ore)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(steel, be at steel mill)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has replace steel in many application)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(steel, be at steel mill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(steel, be at steel mill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aluminum, has replace steel in many application) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has replace steel in many application)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(steel, be at steelmill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(steel, be at steelmill)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steel, be make from iron ore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(steel, be make from iron ore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(metal, be at steel)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(metal, be at metal fabrication shop)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(metal, be at metal fabrication shop)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(metal, be element or alloy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(metal, be element or alloy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at metal fabrication shop)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(metal, be element or alloy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(metal, be element or alloy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(metal, be at metal fabrication shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(metal, be at steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(steel, be at steel mill)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aluminum, has replace steel in many application)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steel, be make from iron ore)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(metal, be at steel) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(steel, be at steelmill)