metal: be attracted to magnets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to magnets 1.00
be used in magnets 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(material, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(metal, be attracted to magnets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(material, be attracted to magnets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(material, be attracted to magnets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cobalt, be used in magnets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(material, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(metal, be attracted to magnets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cobalt, be used in magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cobalt, be used in magnets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(metal, be attracted to magnets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(metal, be attracted to magnets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(material, be attracted to magnets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cobalt, be used in magnets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(metal, be attracted to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(material, be attracted to magnets)