metal: be good conductors of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductors brainly of heat 1.00
be good conductors of heat 1.00
is good heat conductors 1.00
make good conductors of heat 0.99
be better conductors of heat 0.99
is better heat conductors 0.99
be conductors of heat 0.99
is heat conductors 0.99
be such good conductors of heat 0.98
make conductors of heat 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductors of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(metal, be such good conductors of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(metal, be such good conductors of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(metal, be such good conductors of heat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(metal, be such good conductors of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductors of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, be good conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductors of heat)