metal: be strong

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, aluminum
Weight: 0.67
, steel
Weight: 0.67
, uranium
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be strong 1.00
be strong and hard 0.92
be solid 0.85
be used to strength 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(steel, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong and hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(metal, be strong)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(metal, be solid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(metal, be solid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(metal, be solid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(metal, be used to strength)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(metal, be solid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(metal, be used to strength)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(metal, be used to strength)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(metal, be used to strength)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(metal, be strong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(metal, be strong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steel, be strong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(metal, be strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steel, be strong and hard)