metal: spark in microwave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
spark in microwave 1.00
be in microwave spark 1.00
spark in when microwave 0.99
spark inside microwave 0.98
ignite in microwave 0.94
make sparks in microwave 0.90
be in microwave cause 0.90
be in microwave 0.88
go in microwave 0.88
explode in microwave 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, spark in microwave)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, go in microwave)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(aluminum foil, go in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, go in microwave)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(aluminum foil, explode in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aluminum foil, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, spark in microwave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(metal, spark in microwave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, spark in microwave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, spark in microwave)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, go in microwave)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, spark in microwave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, explode in microwave)