meteor: running water in space

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.70
, celestial object
Weight: 0.64
, planet
Weight: 0.56
, solar system
Weight: 0.53
Siblings fireball
Weight: 0.58
, comet
Weight: 0.39
, meteorite
Weight: 0.38
, asteroid
Weight: 0.37
, galaxy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
running water in space 1.00
move through space 0.81
burn in space 0.79
travel through space 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(asteroid, move through space)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(comet, burn in space)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(asteroid, move through space)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(asteroid, move through space)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(comet, burn in space)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(comet, burn in space)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(meteor, running water in space)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(meteor, move through space)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(meteor, move through space)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(meteor, burn in space)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meteor, burn in space)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(meteor, move through space)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meteor, burn in space)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meteor, travel through space)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(meteor, move through space)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(meteor, burn in space)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(meteor, travel through space)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(meteor, travel through space)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(meteor, travel through space)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(meteor, running water in space)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(asteroid, move through space)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meteor, running water in space)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(comet, burn in space)