meteorology: is interesting

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.70 , field Weight: 0.60 , discipline Weight: 0.57 , subject Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.56
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.37 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , astronomy Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is interesting	1.00
is different	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(thing, is different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(meteorology, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(thing, is different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is interesting)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(biology, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(thing, is different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(meteorology, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(biology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(biology, is interesting)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(computer science, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(computer science, is interesting)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(astronomy, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(astronomy, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(meteorology, is interesting)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(meteorology, is different)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(meteorology, is different)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(meteorology, is different)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(meteorology, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(thing, is different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(biology, is interesting)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(astronomy, is interesting)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(thing, is different)