meth: be more expensive than coke in areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drug use
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.67
, drug
Weight: 0.65
, addiction
Weight: 0.60
, amphetamine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings methamphetamine
Weight: 0.40
, heroin
Weight: 0.37
, marijuana
Weight: 0.36
, narcotic
Weight: 0.36
, cocaine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than coke in areas 1.00
be worse than coke 0.89
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drug, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(drug, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cocaine, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cocaine, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cocaine, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(meth, be worse than coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(meth, be worse than coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meth, be worse than coke)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(meth, be worse than coke)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(meth, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(meth, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(meth, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(meth, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cocaine, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(meth, be more expensive than coke in areas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, is expensive)