meth: be problem in rural areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drug use
Weight: 0.69
, substance
Weight: 0.67
, drug
Weight: 0.65
, addiction
Weight: 0.60
, amphetamine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings methamphetamine
Weight: 0.40
, heroin
Weight: 0.37
, marijuana
Weight: 0.36
, narcotic
Weight: 0.36
, cocaine
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in rural areas 1.00
be popular in rural areas 0.94
be more common in rural areas 0.93
flourish in rural areas 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(meth, be problem in rural areas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(meth, be more common in rural areas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(meth, flourish in rural areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meth, be more common in rural areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(meth, be more common in rural areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(meth, be popular in rural areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(meth, be more common in rural areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meth, be popular in rural areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(meth, flourish in rural areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meth, flourish in rural areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(meth, be popular in rural areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(meth, flourish in rural areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(meth, be popular in rural areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(meth, be problem in rural areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(meth, be problem in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(meth, be problem in rural areas)