methamphetamine: was developed

Related concepts

Parents	amphetamine Weight: 0.78 , substance Weight: 0.69 , drug Weight: 0.68 , drug use Weight: 0.67 , narcotic Weight: 0.60
Siblings	cold medicine Weight: 0.60 , ecstasy Weight: 0.56 , meth Weight: 0.40 , heroin Weight: 0.38 , cocaine Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was developed	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(cocaine, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(cocaine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(cocaine, was developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(methamphetamine, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(methamphetamine, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(methamphetamine, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(methamphetamine, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(cocaine, was developed)