method: differ from philosophy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from philosophy 1.00
differ from logic 0.87
differ 0.85
differ from method 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(strategy, differ)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(strategy, differ) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(strategy, differ)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(method, differ from philosophy)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(method, differ from method)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(method, differ from method)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(method, differ from method)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, differ from method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(method, differ from philosophy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(method, differ from philosophy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(method, differ from philosophy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(strategy, differ)