method: far goal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, concept
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.60
Siblings strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65
, electric shock
Weight: 0.65
, mri
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
far goal 1.00
be used to accomplish specific goal 0.80
far victory 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(system, be used to accomplish specific goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(method, far goal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(system, be used to accomplish specific goal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(system, be used to accomplish specific goal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(strategy, far victory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(system, be used to accomplish specific goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(method, far goal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(strategy, far victory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(strategy, far victory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(method, far goal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(method, far goal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(method, far goal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(system, be used to accomplish specific goal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(strategy, far victory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(method, far goal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(system, be used to accomplish specific goal)