metropolitan: were areas defined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bishop
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, film
Weight: 0.49
, office building
Weight: 0.47
, church
Weight: 0.45
Siblings downtown
Weight: 0.31
, diocese
Weight: 0.30
, empire state building
Weight: 0.30
, living thing
Weight: 0.30
, south park
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
were areas defined 1.00
were areas 0.87
were statistical areas defined 0.87
were statistical areas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(metropolitan, were areas defined)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(metropolitan, were areas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(metropolitan, were areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(metropolitan, were areas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(metropolitan, were statistical areas defined)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(metropolitan, were statistical areas defined)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(metropolitan, were areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(metropolitan, were statistical areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(metropolitan, were statistical areas defined)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(metropolitan, were statistical areas defined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(metropolitan, were statistical areas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(metropolitan, were statistical areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(metropolitan, were statistical areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(metropolitan, were areas defined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(metropolitan, were areas defined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(metropolitan, were areas defined)