mexico city: be built on lake

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built on lake 1.00
was build on swamp lands 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(city, be built on lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(city, be built on lake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(mexico city, be built on lake)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(mexico city, was build on swamp lands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mexico city, was build on swamp lands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was build on swamp lands)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mexico city, was build on swamp lands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexico city, be built on lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be built on lake)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mexico city, be built on lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be built on lake)