mexico city: was chosen as capital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chosen as capital 1.00
be called capital 0.87
is capital 0.85
was chosen host 0.79
is ancient capital 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, is capital)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(city, is capital)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, is capital)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, is capital)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mexico city, is capital)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mexico city, be called capital)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mexico city, be called capital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is capital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mexico city, is capital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be called capital)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mexico city, is ancient capital)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mexico city, is ancient capital)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mexico city, was chosen host)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is ancient capital)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mexico city, was chosen host)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mexico city, was chosen host)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be called capital)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen host)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is capital)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is ancient capital)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(city, is capital)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mexico city, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(city, is capital)