miami: be allowed have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.67
, hot spot
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, point
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.37
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed have 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be allowed have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(las vegas, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be allowed have)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(miami, be allowed have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(miami, be allowed have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(miami, be allowed have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(miami, be allowed have)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(las vegas, be allowed have)