microprocessor: be put in cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.73
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.67
, chip
Weight: 0.65
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microcontroller
Weight: 0.59
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.38
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37
, network device
Weight: 0.37
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be put in cars 1.00
be used in cars 0.91
were for automobiles 0.81
were for automobiles developed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(microprocessor, be put in cars)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(microprocessor, be used in cars)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, be used in cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(microprocessor, be used in cars)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, were for automobiles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(microprocessor, were for automobiles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, were for automobiles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(microprocessor, were for automobiles)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, were for automobiles developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, be used in cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, be put in cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(microprocessor, be put in cars)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microprocessor, be put in cars)