microsoft: be located in redmond

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located in redmond 1.00
be in redmond 0.89
be located in richmond 0.85
be based in seattle 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(microsoft, be located in redmond)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be located in richmond)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microsoft, be in redmond)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(microsoft, be located in richmond)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be in redmond)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(microsoft, be located in richmond)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(microsoft, be in redmond)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be based in seattle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(microsoft, be in redmond)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(microsoft, be located in richmond)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(microsoft, be based in seattle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(microsoft, be based in seattle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(microsoft, be based in seattle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be located in redmond)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(microsoft, be located in redmond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microsoft, be located in redmond)