microsoft: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
has quality news 0.79
has quality shit 0.79
be good for development 0.78
be good company work for 0.78
has quality evil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(xml, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(software company, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(xml, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(os, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(os, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(os, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(solaris, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(azure, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(azure, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(unix, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(unix, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(xml, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(software company, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(xml, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(os, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(linux, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(unix, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(unix, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(azure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(azure, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(linux, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(unix, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(unix, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(azure, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(azure, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(solaris, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(solaris, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(microsoft, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(microsoft, has quality news)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality news)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality news)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(microsoft, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(microsoft, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(os, has quality worth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(software company, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(unix, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(azure, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(linux, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(unix, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(azure, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(solaris, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(os, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(software company, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(microsoft, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)