microsoft: is games

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is games 1.00
be in games 0.99
play against splyce 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant, be in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(microsoft, is games)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(giant, play against splyce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(microsoft, is games)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(giant, be in games)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(giant, play against splyce)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(giant, play against splyce)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(giant, be in games)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(giant, be in games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(microsoft, is games)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(giant, play against splyce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(microsoft, is games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(microsoft, is games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is games)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(microsoft, is games)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(giant, be in games)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(giant, play against splyce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(giant, be in games)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(microsoft, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(giant, play against splyce)