microsoft: is word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is word 1.00
is word lagging 0.80
be called exactly language 0.76
works word processor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(xml, be called exactly language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(microsoft, is word)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(xml, be called exactly language)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(xml, be called exactly language)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(xml, be called exactly language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(microsoft, is word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(microsoft, is word)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, works word processor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(microsoft, works word processor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(microsoft, works word processor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(microsoft, works word processor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(microsoft, is word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(xml, be called exactly language)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(microsoft, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(xml, be called exactly language)