microsoft: offer os

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
offer os 1.00
is better os 0.91
be better than os 0.89
has physical part os 0.89
is os hard 0.89
is secure os 0.88
be better than os x 0.87
is most secure os 0.86
be popular os for email 0.85
be more stable than than os 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(linux, be popular os for email)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(linux, is most secure os)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(linux, has physical part os)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(linux, has physical part os)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(linux, has physical part os)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(linux, is most secure os)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(linux, is most secure os)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(linux, be popular os for email)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(linux, be popular os for email)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(microsoft, offer os)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(microsoft, offer os)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(linux, has physical part os)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(linux, is most secure os)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, offer os)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(linux, be popular os for email)