microsoft: was named microsoft

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents os
Weight: 0.69
, software company
Weight: 0.65
, giant
Weight: 0.63
, xml
Weight: 0.60
Siblings azure
Weight: 0.47
, solaris
Weight: 0.39
, freebsd
Weight: 0.38
, unix
Weight: 0.38
, linux
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named microsoft 1.00
be called microsoft 0.97
be called unix 0.84
be better than unix 0.83
be more popular than unix 0.82
being ibm 0.82
be to windows xp 0.82
handle microsoft precision touchpads 0.81
be named linux 0.81
becoming ibm 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than unix)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(unix, be called unix)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(unix, be called unix) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(unix, be called unix)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(linux, be better than unix) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(linux, be better than unix)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(microsoft, was named microsoft)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be called microsoft)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microsoft, be called microsoft)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(microsoft, be called microsoft)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(microsoft, be called microsoft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microsoft, was named microsoft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(unix, be called unix)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microsoft, was named microsoft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(linux, be better than unix)