microwave: be good for cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, household appliance
Weight: 0.65
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, device
Weight: 0.64
, radio wave
Weight: 0.63
Siblings washer
Weight: 0.56
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.40
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.38
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for cooking 1.00
be used for cooking 0.95
be different in cooking food 0.93
cook food 0.86
cook food small 0.85
cook fast food 0.84
work cook 0.84
cook things from outside 0.83
cook things from outside in 0.83
cook from inside 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(microwave oven, cook food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, cook food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(microwave, cook food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(microwave, cook food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(microwave, cook food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(microwave, cook food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(microwave, cook food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(microwave, cook food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(microwave, be used for cooking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be different in cooking food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(microwave, be different in cooking food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be used for cooking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(microwave, be used for cooking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(microwave, be different in cooking food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(microwave, be used for cooking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(microwave, cook food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(microwave, cook food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(microwave, be different in cooking food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(microwave, cook fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(microwave, cook fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(microwave, cook fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(microwave, cook fast food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(microwave, cook fast food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(microwave, cook fast food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(microwave, cook fast food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(microwave, cook fast food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(microwave, work cook)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(microwave, work cook)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(microwave, work cook)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(microwave, work cook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(microwave, be good for cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(microwave, be good for cooking)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(microwave oven, cook food)