migration: is threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.60
, behavior
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.33
, integration
Weight: 0.33
, evolution
Weight: 0.32
, displacement
Weight: 0.32
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is threat 1.00
be threat for lithuania 0.99
is security threat 0.92
be thought as as threat 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(migration, is threat)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(migration, be threat for lithuania)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(migration, is security threat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(migration, is security threat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(migration, be thought as as threat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(migration, be threat for lithuania)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(migration, be thought as as threat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(migration, be threat for lithuania)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(migration, be thought as as threat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(migration, be thought as as threat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(migration, is security threat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(migration, is security threat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(migration, be threat for lithuania)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(migration, is threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(migration, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(migration, is threat)