milan: be good place visit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.58
, town
Weight: 0.56
, club
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.34
, birmingham
Weight: 0.34
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34
, hyderabad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place visit 1.00
be good place live 0.84
be good place for business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(milan, be good place visit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be good place visit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leeds, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place visit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(liverpool, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(portsmouth, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(liverpool, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(liverpool, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(leeds, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(leeds, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(birmingham, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(milan, be good place visit)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(milan, be good place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(milan, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(milan, be good place for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(milan, be good place for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(milan, be good place for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(milan, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(liverpool, be good place visit)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(leeds, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(portsmouth, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(liverpool, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(birmingham, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(milan, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(city, be good place visit)