milk: be considered as food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beverage
Weight: 0.67
, dairy product
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, drink
Weight: 0.65
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.90
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.80
, skim milk
Weight: 0.63
, powdered milk
Weight: 0.39
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as food 1.00
be considered food 0.98
be considered as complete food 0.90
be called food 0.89
is food 0.87
be considered complete food 0.87
be good for food 0.87
be referred as nature 's food 0.85
is most near food 0.83
be considered meal 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(peanut butter, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(milk, be considered as food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, is food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(peanut butter, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(milk, be considered as food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(milk, be considered as food)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(milk, be considered food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(milk, be considered food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(milk, be called food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(milk, is food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milk, be good for food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(milk, is food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(milk, be called food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(milk, be considered food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(milk, be considered food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(milk, be called food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(milk, be called food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(milk, is food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(milk, is food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(milk, be good for food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(milk, be good for food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(milk, be good for food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(milk, be considered as food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(milk, be considered as food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(milk, be considered as food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is food)