milkshake: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.63
, ice cream
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, beverage
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.35
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.85
be at restaurant 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(milkshake, be at resturant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(milkshake, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soda, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(milkshake, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(milkshake, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(milkshake, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(milkshake, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(milkshake, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(milkshake, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)