miller: be against usage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.61
, player
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.59
, candidate
Weight: 0.58
Siblings john smith
Weight: 0.35
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, farmer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be against usage of elektra 1.00
be against usage 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(miller, be against usage)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(miller, be against usage of elektra)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(miller, be against usage of elektra)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(miller, be against usage of elektra)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(miller, be against usage of elektra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(miller, be against usage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(miller, be against usage)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(miller, be against usage)