min: be on phone status

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.56
, minute
Weight: 0.55
, parameter
Weight: 0.53
, character
Weight: 0.51
Siblings interval
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, hour
Weight: 0.31
, max
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on phone status 1.00
be under about phone 0.81
be under phone 0.81
be under under phone calls 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(min, be on phone status)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(min, be under phone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(min, be under phone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(min, be under about phone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(min, be under phone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(min, be under under phone calls)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(min, be under about phone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(min, be under under phone calls)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(min, be under under phone calls)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(min, be under under phone calls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(min, be under about phone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(min, be under phone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(min, be under about phone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(min, be on phone status)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(min, be on phone status) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(min, be on phone status)