mind: is funny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.65
, element
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.62
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings david hume
Weight: 0.58
, backgammon
Weight: 0.35
, idea
Weight: 0.33
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is funny 1.00
is good guy 0.78
is interesting 0.77
have good guy 0.77
is guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(mystery, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mind, is funny)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mystery, is interesting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mystery, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(mystery, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mind, is funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mind, is funny)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mind, is good guy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mind, is good guy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mind, is interesting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mind, is interesting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mind, have good guy)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mind, is funny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mind, is funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mystery, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(mind, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mystery, is interesting)