mind: is good show

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.65
, element
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.62
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings david hume
Weight: 0.58
, backgammon
Weight: 0.35
, idea
Weight: 0.33
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good show 1.00
is show 0.93
has quality good 0.76
have good guy 0.76
is good guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mystery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mind, is good show)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mystery, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mystery, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(idea, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mystery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mind, is good show)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(idea, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(idea, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mind, is good show)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mind, is show)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(mind, is show)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mind, is show)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(mind, is show)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mind, have good guy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mind, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mind, is good guy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mind, have good guy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good guy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mind, have good guy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mind, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mind, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mind, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mind, have good guy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mind, is good guy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mind, is good guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mind, is good show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mystery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(idea, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(mind, is good show)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mystery, has quality good)