mind: then watching tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents consideration
Weight: 0.65
, element
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.62
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings david hume
Weight: 0.58
, backgammon
Weight: 0.35
, idea
Weight: 0.33
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, dark matter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
then watching tv 1.00
be rated tv 14 0.81
be on television 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dark matter, be rated tv 14)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(dark matter, be rated tv 14) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(dark matter, be rated tv 14)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(mind, then watching tv)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mind, be on television)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mind, be on television)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mind, be on television)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mind, be rated tv 14)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mind, be on television)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mind, then watching tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mind, then watching tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mind, then watching tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dark matter, be rated tv 14)