minister: is incompetent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prime minister
Weight: 0.75
, religious leader
Weight: 0.65
, figure
Weight: 0.61
, leader
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ministry
Weight: 0.75
, parliament
Weight: 0.60
, deacon
Weight: 0.58
, chancellor
Weight: 0.55
, evangelist
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
is incompetent 1.00
be in trilogy incompetent 0.86
be in new trilogy incompetent 0.86
is corrupt 0.76
have impotent 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(leader, is corrupt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(minister, is incompetent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(leader, is corrupt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(leader, is corrupt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ministry, have impotent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(leader, is corrupt)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(minister, is incompetent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ministry, have impotent)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ministry, have impotent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(minister, is incompetent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(minister, is incompetent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(leader, is corrupt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ministry, have impotent)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(minister, is incompetent)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(leader, is corrupt)